Basic report
In the basic report of the professor V.A.Klevno problems of forensic pathology of live persons in the modern criminal trial have been covered. It is noticed, that at annual growth of volume of the executed examinations and inspections of live persons, the quantity of the medicolegal experts occupied with manufacture of given researches remains practically at one level. The load on one doctor of the medicolegal expert of a department of examination of the victims convicted, etc. persons on the average across the Russian Federation exceeds standard in 1,5 times. The structure of spent examinations and researches concerning live persons as it is noted in the report, is presented as follows: 97 % constitute examinations of health harm, 2 % - examinations of sexual conditions and 1 % are miscellaneous examinations (e.g. definition of age, cicatrixes, an establishment of professional working ability loss). Considering the specified parity of kinds of expert researches, the basic attention of the lecturer has been referred on the questions, concerning examinations of harm to health. Throughout last 10-years BSME organisation carry out realisation of these examinations, not having legislative normative acts of the Russian Federation and standard legal documents of Ministry of Health and social development of the Russian Federation which would regulate their action in strict conformity with criminal code of the Russian Federation, taken effect since January, 1st, 1997.
However, as it has been noted in the report, occurrence of these new standard documents does not take out enough the large number of questions over which not only experts of the Russian centre of forensic pathology work is necessary, but also of the chairs of forensic medicine and BSME.
Further in a speech a number of terminological concepts was affected, without accurate representation of which forensic pathology of harm estimation that was caused to health of the person, cannot be faultless.
The listed questions require not only scientific working out, but also in fastening of its results in new standard legal documents, over which judicial physicians should work in the near future to bring under practical work of experts the new scientific and methodical basis.
The lecturer also had paid attention on one more priority problem in examination of health harm, bound to use of data from medical documents.
The problem consists in that now medicolegal experts in a research part of the conclusion do not reflect the maintenance of the carried out research of these data and the results received thus.
At the best in the first paragraph of a research part of the expert's statement covering research of the medical document, more or less detailed abstract of the medical document the list of methods of research applied thus precedes. At worst there is not even that.
